Velocity

Velocity is a simple idea that’s often misunderstood. It measures how much work a team has completed in a sprint, and over time, it can show an average that helps teams plan what’s realistic for the next one. It’s a useful guide, but it’s not a goal in itself.

Some teams treat velocity like a target or a competition (and some are pushed to). They try to “set” it higher or compare it across teams, hoping it will prove that they’re getting faster. But velocity is not a budget, a forecast, or a speedometer. It’s a reflection of real progress made by a team working together, not a scoreboard of individual performance.

Used well, velocity helps a team understand their delivery rhythm and make sustainable plans. Used poorly, it can create pressure, encourage over-commitment, and hide the very problems it’s meant to reveal.

That’s why alignment matters. When a team plans together, estimates together, and agrees on what success looks like, velocity becomes a sign of steady progress rather than a race for points.

Where real pressure comes in: leadership, metrics and expectations

Team velocity often becomes a target not because the team wants it that way, but because leadership or stakeholders push for higher numbers. Community threads and agile commentators repeatedly flag this.

1. Metric as performance tool rather than guide

In “Is Measuring Velocity in Scrum Good or Bad for Your Team?” our partners at CPrime warn of risks to team morale and performance when teams are compared based on velocity. When velocity is viewed as proof of output, pressures mount to inflate estimates or cram more work.

2. Unrealistic demands from above

Teams feel the squeeze when leaders look at velocity charts and ask “Why can’t we do more?”. This shifts the burden to the team rather than the planning process. In practice, such demands lead to corners being cut, assumptions going unchallenged, and real issues being hidden. After all, increasing velocity by 20% could be as simple as inflating estimates by 25%.

3. Misuse of comparisons and individual “velocity”

Some leaders want to pit teams against each other or measure individuals. According to the Agile Alliance, “only the aggregate velocity of the team matters, and the phrase ‘individual velocity’ is meaningless.” That misuse causes resentment, gaming metrics, and fractured collaboration.

4. Volatility triggers pressure, not insight

When velocity swings — up or down — leadership often responds with mandates rather than inquiry. But those swings often signal real issues: unclear stories, unexpected dependencies, or overcommitment. Treating them as failures rather than clues deepens the challenge.

What alignment really means

Alignment is not a meeting. It is a shared understanding that connects planning, estimation, and delivery. When a team is aligned, everyone sees the same goal, understands what it will take to achieve it, and recognises where the risks lie.

But if alignment were easy, misalignment wouldn’t show up so often. You can usually spot it when planning feels tense, with people talking past each other, or it goes completely quiet as no one feels confident to speak up. Estimates vary wildly, or work shifts mid-sprint because the team never agreed on what “done” meant. All of this points to the same issue: the team doesn’t yet share a clear, common understanding of the work.

True alignment happens when planning and estimation happen together. Teams discuss what matters, how complex it is, and how confident they feel. Product owners bring the context, engineers share the technical view, and designers help surface dependencies. Together they build a realistic plan that connects the work to the outcome.

Once this shared view exists, estimates and velocity reflect understanding rather than guesswork. The team can plan with more confidence and adapt with less stress. Alignment is what yields the real progress.

How alignment is built in practice

Alignment doesn’t happen by accident. It’s shaped through open conversations, shared visibility, and habits that keep everyone working from the same plan. Tools support this, but alignment comes from how people use them together.

1. Start planning from shared priorities

Begin with what matters most. Sprint goals or high-level initiatives help anchor the discussion before you get into the detail of breaking down tasks. When everyone sees how each story connects to an outcome, decisions stay grounded in value and you reduce the opportunity for strong opinions to have undue influence.

2. Estimate as a team, not as individuals

The benefit of estimation comes from the conversation and the opportunity to share understanding. When people share their view of effort and complexity, hidden assumptions can surface early and be clarified. The Planning Poker feature in TeamRhythm makes this easy to run inside Jira, keeping the discussion focused on the work itself.

3. Keep priorities visible and current

Goals that can’t be seen are quickly forgotten, but a live view of the sprint in Jira helps everyone see what’s next, what’s at risk, and what’s already done.

With TeamRhythm, teams can set clear goals for each sprint or iteration and see how every story connects to those goals. User stories sit under epics, showing at a glance how work is grouped and how each piece contributes to the bigger picture. The story map view keeps this visible to everyone, without adding extra admin.

4. Revisit alignment often

Alignment isn’t something you agree on once and then take for granted; it needs small, regular check-ins. The daily stand-up is a great time to do this. Use stand-ups to confirm what still matters most, discuss any new dependencies that have surfaced, and make quick adjustments before things slow down.

When you keep alignment visible in this way, it becomes part of how you work rather than another meeting to run. The plan stays shared, delivery feels steadier, and progress is easier to trust.

Turning alignment into confidence

Alignment is about giving people the clarity and trust they need to work as a team with confidence. When the whole team understands what matters, what’s achievable, and how their work contributes, they can move forward with focus instead of hesitation.

That shared understanding encourages open conversations, early problem-solving, and flexibility when things change. People feel comfortable speaking up because they know their perspective helps shape the outcome. Those are the building blocks of steady progress.

With that kind of clarity, velocity becomes a reflection of how well the team works together rather than how quickly they move. The numbers stop creating pressure and start showing evidence of reliable delivery.

Confident teams make thoughtful decisions, adapt to change without losing direction, and keep delivering work that truly matters. That’s what alignment makes possible.

‍